C1 ADVANCED · WRITING · EXAMPLE

C1 Advanced email example, marked

The same email written twice: first an answer that would get about 10 out of 20 (just below a pass), then the same answer improved to about 18 out of 20. Every problem and every improvement is marked and explained, criterion by criterion.

The task

You have recently taken part in a week-long volunteering project organised by an international charity. You receive this email from the project coordinator.

We’d be very grateful if you could tell us what you found most worthwhile about the project, any problems you experienced, and how you think the project could be improved for future volunteers.

Laura Ferreira, Project Coordinator

Write your email in reply.

Write your email in 220–260 words.

Answer 1

about 10 / 20

Hi!1

Thanks for your email. I am writing to give you my feedback about the project in Portugal. I want to say thank you for the opportunity.

The best part of the project was working with the children in the summer camp. They were very funny and their parents were also very friendly. I learned a lot about Portuguese culture. We worked in the morning from 9 to 1 and in the afternoon we prepared activities for the next day. The food was good too, especially the fish. Also the other volunteers were very nice and we did a lot of activities together in our free time, for example we went to the beach.

There were some problems.2 The accommodation was not very good because the rooms were very small and there was not enough showers3 for twenty people. Also the timetable changed a lot and sometimes we didn't know what to do. Also the internet in the house didn't work very well, so it was difficult to call my family.

In general I think the project was very good and I recommend it to other people. The coordinators were very kind and they helped us a lot. I would like to do it again next year if it's possible.

See you!4

Marta

213 words

What goes wrong

  1. Too informal for an email to a project coordinator you don’t know well.
  2. The reader needs details: which problems, and how serious were they?
  3. “there were not enough showers” – and the language stays simple for C1.
  4. Too informal – and the email never suggests how to improve the project, one of the three questions.

The marks

Content3 / 5

What was worthwhile and the problems are covered, but there are no suggestions for improvement.

Communicative achievement2 / 5

Too informal for the reader, and the problems are listed without tact or detail.

Organisation2 / 5

Paragraphs are clear, but the linking is basic (Also, In general).

Language3 / 5

Mostly accurate, but simple and repetitive for C1 (very good, very nice, very small).

Answer 2: the same ideas, improved

about 18 / 20

Dear Ms Ferreira,1

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment on last month’s project in Portugal. Overall, it was an immensely rewarding experience, and I hope my feedback proves useful.2

Without doubt, the most worthwhile aspect was working with the children at the summer camp. Their enthusiasm was infectious, and seeing their confidence in English grow over the week was genuinely moving3. I also valued the chance to work alongside volunteers from so many different countries. The training session on the first day was also extremely well run and gave us the confidence we needed.

That said, there were a couple of issues that I feel should be addressed.4 The accommodation, while clean, was rather cramped, with only two showers for twenty volunteers. More importantly, the daily timetable changed at very short notice on several occasions, which left us unsure of our responsibilities.

With this in mind, I would suggest5 sharing a weekly plan before the project begins and appointing one volunteer each day to pass on any changes. This would also make it easier for new volunteers to settle in. It might also be worth looking into larger accommodation, even if this meant a slightly higher contribution from participants.

I would be delighted to take part again next year, and please do not hesitate to contact me if you need any further details6.

Kind regards,

Marta Ruiz

230 words

What makes it better

  1. An appropriate greeting for a coordinator: polite and formal, but not stiff.
  2. Sets a positive, constructive tone from the start.
  3. A specific, personal reason instead of a general “it was good”.
  4. A tactful move to the problems.
  5. Moves clearly to the recommendations – the third part of the task.
  6. A polite, formal close.

The marks

Content5 / 5

All three questions are answered in detail, with practical suggestions.

Communicative achievement5 / 5

Polite, constructive and tactful – the right tone for feedback to an organiser.

Organisation4 / 5

One paragraph per question, with smooth transitions (That said, With this in mind).

Language4 / 5

A wide range of precise language (infectious, cramped, at very short notice) with very few errors.

What made the difference

  • Content: A whole paragraph of suggestions answers the third question.
  • Communicative achievement: The problems are explained tactfully, as part of helpful feedback, in a suitable formal register.
  • Organisation: Clear transitions guide the reader from the positives to the problems to the solutions.
  • Language: Precise, C1-level words replace “very good”, “very nice” and “very small”.
Finn the puffin, smiling kindly
Finn's exam tip

Think about who will read your email and why. Here, a coordinator wants useful feedback: be polite, be specific and offer solutions, not just complaints.

Now write your own

Practise with real exam tasks and model answers, and get AI feedback on your email: an estimated mark for each criterion, your mistakes corrected and tips to improve.

More examples

The marks are Levoop’s estimate using the four criteria Cambridge uses for Writing (0–5 each). Only Cambridge English can give an official mark. The texts were written for Levoop.

Practice → Check → Learn → Repeat ↻