Work · Reading practice · B2

Four days a week: what happened when companies tried it

Work less, earn the same and get just as much done? A large trial in the UK put the idea to the test.

By Levoop · 4-minute read · 392 words · Tap the underlined words to see what they mean

A team of people working at a table with laptops
In the trial, staff worked fewer hours for the same pay.Photo: RonaldCandonga / Pixabay

For more than a century, the five-day working week has been the standard in most of the world. But what would happen if we worked four days instead – and were paid exactly the same? For many people, it sounds too good to be true. In 2022, a group of companies in the United Kingdom decided to find out.

Around 60 organisations, from small design studios to restaurants and banks, took part in a six-month with nearly 3,000 employees. The rule was simple: would work 80 per cent of their usual hours, keep 100 per cent of their pay and, in return, try to 100 per cent of their . Researchers measured the results by asking both the employees and the managers.

The results surprised even some of the organisers. Most companies reported that productivity stayed about the same, and in some cases it actually went up. Employees said they felt less stressed and slept better, and many fewer people left their jobs during the trial than in the same period the year before. When the six months were over, more than 90 per cent of the companies decided to continue with the four-day week, and some made it .

How was this possible? Many teams found that they had been wasting time without realising it. They cut meetings shorter, reduced and on the tasks that really mattered. With an extra day off, people also came back to work on Monday with more energy.

Not everyone is convinced, however. Critics point out that the companies in the trial chose to take part, so they were probably more about the idea than a typical business would be. A four-day week is also much harder to organise in jobs where someone has to be present all the time, such as hospitals, schools or shops. In these cases, companies may need more staff, which costs money.

Other countries, including Spain, Iceland and Belgium, have run their own trials or introduced new rules that give workers more . The results have generally been positive, but experts warn that there is no single model that works for every company.

What the experiments do show is that the number of hours we spend at work is not the only thing that matters. How we use those hours may be just as important.

Reading the News · levoop.com/reading-the-news/four-day-week · More articles and Cambridge exam practice at www.levoop.com

Check your understanding

Choose the best answer. Every answer comes with an explanation.

1. What did employees have to do in return for working fewer hours?

2. What happened to productivity in most companies?

3. According to the article, how did teams manage to do the same work in less time?

4. Why are some critics not convinced by the results?

5. What is the main message of the final paragraph?

Useful expressions

  • too good to be true – so good that it is difficult to believe
    “it sounds too good to be true”
  • in return – as a payment or exchange for something
    “and, in return, try to maintain 100 per cent of their productivity”
  • point out – mention a fact that others may not have noticed
    “Critics point out that the companies in the trial chose to take part”

Key words

  • trial: a test to see how well something works
  • staff: the people who work for an organisation
  • maintain: keep something at the same level
  • productivity: how much work is done in a period of time
  • permanent: lasting for ever, not temporary
  • interruptions: things that stop you while you are doing something
  • focused: gave all your attention to one thing
  • enthusiastic: very interested and excited about something
  • flexibility: the ability to change easily to suit a situation

Answer key

  1. Try to keep their productivity at the same level. – C: “in return, try to maintain 100 per cent of their productivity.”
  2. It stayed about the same. – B: “Most companies reported that productivity stayed about the same.”
  3. They stopped wasting time on unnecessary things. – C: they cut meetings, reduced interruptions and focused on what mattered.
  4. The companies chose to take part, so they may not be typical. – B: “the companies in the trial chose to take part, so they were probably more enthusiastic… than a typical business.”
  5. How we use our working time matters as much as how long we work. – B: “How we use those hours may be just as important.”

Keep reading

Preparing for the exam? Practise the B2 First Reading paper, part by part, with every answer explained.