Reading the NewsC1  Education

Education · Reading practice · C1

Does handwriting still matter in a digital age?

Children type before they can write joined-up letters, and adults rarely pick up a pen. Should we be worried?

By Levoop · 5-minute read · 484 words · Tap the underlined words to see what they mean

A hand writing in a notebook with a fountain pen
Writing by hand forces us to slow down and summarise.Photo: Pexels / Pixabay

When did you last write something longer than a shopping list by hand? For many adults, the answer is: a long time ago. Emails have replaced letters, notes are taken on phones, and in many classrooms laptops and tablets have become standard equipment. Some countries have even stopped requiring schools to teach joined-up handwriting. To many, the pen looks increasingly like a of another era.

Yet a number of researchers and teachers argue that abandoning handwriting would be a mistake – not out of , but because writing by hand appears to do something for the brain that typing does not. Forming letters with a pen requires fine motor control and the coordination of movement, vision and attention. Studies of young children suggest that learning to write letters by hand helps them to recognise those letters more easily, which in turn supports early reading.

For older students, much of the debate has focused on note-taking. In a widely cited study published in 2014, students who took notes on laptops tended to write down lectures almost word for word, whereas those writing by hand, unable to keep up, had to summarise and rephrase. When tested later, the handwriters performed better on questions that required understanding. The researchers suggested that the very slowness of handwriting forced students to process the material more deeply.

As with many influential findings, however, the picture has since become more complicated. Attempts to the study have produced weaker or inconsistent effects, and some researchers argue that what matters is not the tool but the strategy: students who summarise in their own words on a laptop may learn just as well as those using a pen. Laptops also bring clear advantages, including speed, and ease of editing – not to mention accessibility for students with conditions that make handwriting difficult.

The laptop’s greatest weakness may lie elsewhere. A screen connected to the internet offers constant , and several studies have found that students who during lectures – checking messages or browsing – remember less, and may even the learning of classmates sitting nearby who can see their screens.

What emerges is less a battle between pen and keyboard than a question of balance. Few educators would seriously propose returning to a world without computers, and typing is an essential skill in its own right. But many argue that handwriting deserves a secure place in the curriculum, particularly in the early years, and that adults, too, might benefit from picking up a pen when they need to think something through rather than simply record it.

There is also a more personal dimension. A handwritten note carries something of its author – their , their hesitations, their crossings-out – in a way that a typed message rarely does. In an age of instant, digital text, that may be reason enough to keep the art of handwriting alive.

Reading the News · levoop.com/reading-the-news/does-handwriting-still-matter · More articles and Cambridge exam practice at www.levoop.com

Check your understanding

Choose the best answer. Every answer comes with an explanation.

1. Why do some researchers think handwriting is still important?

2. What did the 2014 study suggest?

3. What have later studies shown?

4. According to the article, what may be the biggest problem with laptops in class?

5. What is the writer’s conclusion?

Useful expressions

  • word for word – using exactly the same words
    “Students who took notes on laptops tended to write down lectures almost word for word.”
  • keep up (with) – move or work at the same speed as someone or something
    “Those writing by hand, unable to keep up, had to summarise and rephrase.”
  • in its own right – because of its own qualities, not because of its connection with something else
    “Typing is an essential skill in its own right.”

Key words

  • relic: something that has survived from the past but is no longer used much
  • nostalgia: a feeling of missing the past
  • conceptual: connected with ideas and principles rather than facts
  • replicate: repeat a study to see if the results are the same
  • legibility: how easy something is to read
  • distractions: things that take your attention away from what you are doing
  • multitask: do several things at the same time
  • impair: damage or make worse
  • idiosyncrasies: unusual habits or features that are typical of one person
  • interchangeable: able to be exchanged for each other because they are all the same

Answer key

  1. Because it seems to benefit the brain in ways typing does not – B: “not out of nostalgia, but because writing by hand appears to do something for the brain that typing does not”.
  2. Handwriters understood concepts better because they had to summarise – B: handwriters “had to summarise and rephrase” and “performed better on questions that required conceptual understanding”.
  3. Weaker or inconsistent effects – B: “Attempts to replicate the study have produced weaker or inconsistent effects.”
  4. They offer constant distractions – C: “A screen connected to the internet offers constant distractions.”
  5. Handwriting should keep a place alongside typing – B: “less a battle between pen and keyboard than a question of balance”.

Keep reading

Preparing for the exam? Practise the C1 Advanced Reading paper, part by part, with every answer explained.